Clegg's Recall Bill was a stitch-up. Cameron must keep his promise to introduce the real thing.
It¹s hard to exaggerate the level of voter disengagement with politics. The signs are all around us. Turnout at elections continues to sink, membership of political parties is at an all time low, radio phone-ins fizzle with rage whenever politics is discussed.
Some of my colleagues put this down to the expenses scandal, but we know that voter turnout has been sinking for years, and for most people, it¹s likely that the scandal merely confirmed a prejudice that was already there.
There is a sense that politics has become so detached and remote, that no matter how – or even if – people vote, nothing ever changes. When even a serious commentator like Jeremy Paxman admits he found the choice at a recent election so “unappetising” that he didn’t vote, we know that we are heading in a dangerous direction. After all, no country has ever walked away from democracy towards a brighter or better place.
I think we have reached one of those points in our history where democracy must evolve, as it did in response to the vast social changes triggered by industrialisation. From the first Reform Act of 1832 to universal suffrage in 1969, each step involved politicians reluctantly giving people more ownership of their democracy. No one today regrets any of those changes.
Our world has changed again beyond recognition, in large part due to the internet, and the almost limitless access to knowledge and information it has made possible.
But despite all this, the way we do democracy has stood still. We have a system where MPs are almost entirely insulated from constituents in between elections. After an election, the pressure is all top down from the party, not bottom up. There is no mechanism allowing voters to sack their MP, no matter how badly they are let down. Unless jailed for more than a year, an MP is inviolable. In some safe seats, even the election is a formality.
Then in the heat of expenses scandal, leaders of the three main parties seemed finally to appreciate the need – and public appetite – for reform, each promising to bring in a system of recall that would allow voters to hold MPs to account. It was a giant step.
True recall is simple. If a percentage of constituents – usually 20 per cent – sign a petition in a given time frame, they earn the right to have a referendum in which voters are asked if they want to recall their MP. If more than half say yes, there is a subsequent by-election.
As a mechanism to restore faith in politics, recall is second to none. It would break the stranglehold of ‘safe seats’, ensuring MPs can be held to account at all times, and it would help settle the strained relationship between people and power.
Of all the reform ideas on offer around the time of the election, recall was the only one that would actually have empowered voters. It caught people’s imagination.
But then the election happened, and the self-styled great reformer, Nick Clegg, was asked to draw up a Recall Bill. He did, and the result is nothing short of disgraceful.
Clegg’s Recall Bill is so far removed from genuine recall, it is recall in name only.
Instead of empowering voters to sack bad MPs, which is how recall works the world over, Clegg’s version hands power up to a committee of fellow MPs. In other words, what was supposed to be a tool to enable voters to hold the institution to account has been transformed by Clegg into a tool for enabling the institution to hold itself to account. It is a breathtakingly cynical attempt to convey an impression of democratic reform without actually empowering voters in any sense at all.
Putting it far too politely, the Political & Constitutional Reform Committee said that the Government¹s version of recall “would reduce public confidence in politics by creating expectations that are not fulfilled”. I call it a stitch up. After all, under Clegg’s Bill, an MP could stop doing surgeries, abandon Parliament, switch to an extreme party, break every promise, and even go on a five-year holiday, all without any threat of recall.
It is surely revealing that not a single organisation interested in democratic reform, or a single reform-minded MP backed the Lib Dem plans. Not one.
In the past, Clegg has explained his reluctance to pursue genuine recall on the basis that he¹d never get it through Parliament, and particularly the Conservative backbenches. He was proved wrong in December when my own Recall Bill was backed by a thumping great majority of 7-1, most of them Conservative.
A more plausible factor is his fear of what he refers to as “kangaroo courts”; or an ill-informed and easily manipulated mob. Much the same arguments were used to prevent women being given the vote.
Boil it down, and it is essentially an argument against all elections, and indeed democracy itself, because in true recall the only court is the constituency, the only jurors are the voters. It is theoretically possible of course that an MP might be unfairly removed from office under recall, but the same can be said of any election. And where recall happens, there are no known examples of successful vexatious recall attempts.
In short, voters can be trusted.
Clegg refused to amend his Bill, and there was never any prospect of self-respecting MPs backing it in Parliament. If the Government has binned it, that is good news.
But if the Government has also binned the promise that underpinned it, that¹s a different matter. Voters remember David Cameron¹s passionate promotion of recall before the election, and they will wonder why he has chosen to abandon the promise he so boldly made.
They will conclude that it was just another cynical stunt. For a leader battling to appear authentic to voters, it¹s not a good look, and we must hope he reconsiders.
Clegg’s briefings to newspapers, meanwhile, are beyond parody. Despite protestations by some of his MPs that his Bill was a “step in the right direction”, and a “modest version of recall”, anyone interested in this issue knows it was neither. On the contrary, it would have taken democracy backwards. It was not recall; it was an insult to voters.
While these vital reforms have now been delayed, our leaders must know that the cynical manner in which they have been delayed will ultimately strengthen the cause of the reformers.
You can sign Zac Goldsmith’s petition demanding a proper recall mechanism HERE.
First published by Conservativehome on Monday 17th February.
Zac Goldsmith: Richmond's Lib Dems undermine Heathrow Campaign
Zac Goldsmith: Intervention in Syria
Zac Goldsmith for The Times: This desperate idea will set neighbour against neighbour
Zac Goldsmith for The New Statesman: The third runway is lazy thinking by those who should know better
Zac Goldsmith for The Guardian: A third runway at Heathrow would be an off-the-scale betrayal
Zac Goldsmith for the Mail on Sunday: Proposals to reform Charity Tax
Zac Goldsmith: Heathrow Expansion and update, April 2012
Zac Goldsmith: Planning reforms must not be a blank cheque for developers
Zac Goldsmith: True Recall
The Times: Number 10 too soft on big businesses
Zac Goldsmith for the Guardian: 'Greenest government ever' must do better – but so must green groups too
Zac Goldsmith: Zac calls for radical reform of European Arrest Warrant
Zac Goldsmith: Edmund Burke and Direct Democracy
Zac Goldsmith for the Richmond and Kingston Informer: Planning Reforms must inspire confidence
Zac Goldsmith: We Have to Support Dairy Farmers at Every Opportunity
Zac Goldsmith for the Richmond and Kingston Informer: Heathrow Trials
Huffington Post: Only one way to reform parliament
Zac Goldsmith for the Richmond and Kingston Informer: The tip of the Iceberg
Zac Goldsmith: News of the World
Zac Goldsmith for the Richmond and Kingston Informer: A Message to Thames Water
Zac Goldsmith for the Richmond and Kingston Informer: The Future of Wild Circus Animals
Zac Goldsmith for the Richmond and Kingston Informer: Parliament Votes to end Fish Discards
Zac Goldsmith: Is my Party reneging on its green promises?
Zac Goldsmith: Forests, What next?
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Night Flights
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Saving our forests
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Why I'm backing Hugh's Fish Fight
Zac Goldsmith: Why AV is not the answer
Zac Goldsmith for the New Statesman: Make MP's work for their Voters and not their Party
Zac Goldsmit: Daylight Savings: Success in the Commons
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Daylight savings bill
Zac Goldsmith: Zac backs measures to strengthen Parliament
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Two Good Bills Crash and Burn
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Good School Food
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Our High Streets Need You
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: Time for a Change
Zac Goldsmith: Real Local Democracy
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: True Democracy
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: New School for North Kingston?
Zac Goldsmith for The Richmond and Kingston Informer: The Budget
Zac Goldsmith: In Praise of the BBC
Zac Goldsmith: Sea Shepherd needs our support
Zac Goldsmith: Here’s another depressing example of modern Britain’s bizarre morality
Zac Goldsmith: MP's demand an end to Pig Cruelty
Zac Goldsmith: Are we civilised?
Zac Goldsmith: Councils CAN stop garden grabbing
Zac Goldsmith: Sunday Times article
Zac Goldsmith: Answers Lib Dem Smears
The Guardian: The Big Green Bogey Man
Zac Goldsmith: How have the BNP been allowed to make political capital?
Zac Goldsmith: Here's what's wrong with Politics
Reversing Labour's tendency to police, regulate and ban will create a more successful and caring society.
Evening Standard: A bright green future beckons...
Hacan: Richmond: The 2nd most overflown borough in London
Zac Goldsmith: Turning Green into Gold
Babelgum: Zac: Humans as parasites
Earth Restoration Services: Put your hand up to 'Restore the Earth'
Conservatives: The Low Carbon Economy
Times Online: Regular referendums will revive democracy
Social Market Foundation: Politicians must share power or lose it
Richmond & Twickenham Times: We need to keep Runway Alternation
Policy Exchange: Keeping the environment at the top of the agenda
Letter to TLF: Airtrack Scheme concerns
Barnes and East Sheen directory: Support our small shops
Resouce UK Magazine: Recycling
The Evening Standard: Stop building on our gardens
The Independent: Fluoride: Is it safe?
The Evening Standard: 3rd runway: The wrong answer to the wrong question
The Guardian: The New Tories
The Evening Standard: Nuclear Power? It's not too late to say, 'No thanks'
The Guardian: My tips for Boris
Platform 10: Why fuel and food prices are rising
Platform 10: Save our small shops
The Evening Standard: London just doesnt need a third runway
The Daily Telegraph: We cant carry on soaking up resources
The Mail on Sunday: Why do we let shops give us all this rubbish?
The Daily Telegraph: Locals should have power over developers
The Daily Telegraph: Let the free market fight climate change
The Ecologist: Sense about Science
The Ecologist: The Stern Report
The Ecologist: British Children, Mental health problems
The Ecologist: NIMBYism
The Independent: Don't delete nukes from the menu